Jessy Wilson v. Commissioner of Excise
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 5TH ASHADHA, 1940
RP.No. 517 of 2018
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.10181/2018 DATED 05-06-2018)
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WRIT PETITION:
JESSY WILSON, W/O.(LATE WILSON GEORGE), AGED 57 YEARS, PROPRIETRIX, HOTEL ROYAL PLAZA, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
(RESIDING AT KANNIMEL KALEEKKAL PUTHEN BUNGLOW, CHARUMMOODU.P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690 505)
BY ADV.SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS IN WRIT PETITION:
1. COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033.
2. DEPUTY EXCISE COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY EXCISE COMMISSIONER, ALAPPUZHA - 688 001.
3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, OFFICE OF THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, HARIPAD - 690 514.
4. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF TOURISM, HOTEL AND RESTAURANTS DIVISION, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR,
INDIA TOURISM (SOUTHERN REGION) 154 ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 002.
R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.B.VINOD R4 BY SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-06-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
RP.No. 517 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE FL3 LICENSE RENEWAL CERTIFICATE WITH FL3 NO.A-20/2018-2019, DATED 2/4/2018
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
sts 26/6/2018
ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
R.P.No. 517 of 2018
in
W.P(C).No. 10181 of 2018
Dated this the 26th day of June, 2018
O R D E R
Heard learned counsel for the review petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
The time limit stated in the judgment for consideration of Exhibit P5 application is corrected as three months instead of three weeks.
The review petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN
JUDGE
vgs26/6
Jessy Wilson
Commissioner of Excise
Deputy Excise Commissioner
Circle Inspector of Excise
Government of India
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court