Xavier v. Jessy Antony
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular First Appeal disposed upon the parties reaching a mediated settlement. The trial court's decree was set aside in satisfaction of the claim.
What did the court decide?
Trial court decree set aside in terms of compromise agreement; Rs. 5,50,000 paid; appeal memorandum fees refunded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 18TH PHALGUNA, 1939
RFA.No. 618 of 2005
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13-06-2005 IN OS 177/2001 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,THRISSUR
APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
XAVIER, S/O.PULLANIKKAD ANDADIYIL THARAKAN PORINCHU, PULLANIKKAD DESOM,, VADAKKANCHERY VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY TALUK. (DIED) LR'S IMPLEADED)
THE ADDITIONAL APPELLANTS 2 AND 3 AND THE ADDITIONAL SECOND RESPONDENT IMPLEADED AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DECEASED FIRST APPELLANT VIDE ORDER DATED 9.3.2018 IN I.A.2807/16.
ADDL.APPELLANT 2 - MOLY XAVIER,
W/O.XAVIER, AGED 51 YEARS, THARAKAN HOUSE, PULLANIKKAD DESOM, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
XAVIER (DECEASED) LR'S IMPLEADED by MOLY XAVIER and ANISHA RINTO
- respondent
JESSY ANTONY
- respondent
ANIL THARAKAN XAVIER
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court