Sasi v. Subashini
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala disposed of the appeal based on a lawful compromise recorded during mediation. The settlement involved property relinquishment by respondents and payment by appellants, resulting in the setting aside of the preliminary decree.
What did the court decide?
The preliminary decree is set aside; the appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise including property relinquishment and payment obligations.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 20TH MAGHA, 1939
RFA.No. 374 of 2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE IN OS 35/2013 OF SUB COURT, KOCHI
APPELLANT(S)/DEFENDANTS
1 SASI AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. BHASKARAN RAMANGODATH, NOW RESIDING IN RAMANGODATH, NAYARAMBALAM, PARAVOOTHARA MURI, PARAVOOR VILLAGE, WEST OF KANNANKULANGARA TEMPLE.
- 2 SADANANDAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. BHASKARAN RAMANGODATH, NAYARAMBALAM, NAYARAMBALAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK.
- 3 SANTHOSH, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O. BHASKARAN RAMANGODATH, NAYARAMBALAM, NAYARAMBALAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK.
- 4 KAUSALYA, AGED 78 YEARS, W/O. BHASKARAN RAMANGODATH NAYARAMBALAM, NAYARAMBALAM VILLAGE.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the compromise settlement between the parties is lawful and valid.
How the appeal should be disposed of based on the recorded compromise.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sasi
- appellant
Sadanandan
- appellant
Santhosh
- appellant
Kausalya
- respondent
Subashini
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court