Yoosuf v. Nani
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala, in a revision petition, confirmed the order of eviction passed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority against a tenant who failed to prove occupation of the premises. The tenant was directed to surrender vacant possession within one month.
What did the court decide?
The applicant was directed to surrender vacant possession within one month from the date of the order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST 2018 / 15TH SRAVANA, 1940
RCRev..No. 48 of 2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RCA 112/2016 of ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, KOZHIKODE DATED 27-07-2017 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RCP 39/2014 of MUNSIFF COURT, NADAPURAM DATED 29-01-2016
REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/IST RESPONDENT:
YOOSUF
AGED 62 YEARS, S/O. AMMAD (LATE), CHATTINDAVIDA HOUSE, KUMMAMKODE AMSOM DESOM, KALLACHI P.O., VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 506
BY ADVS.SRI.K.A.JALEEL SRI.C.Y.VINOD KUMAR
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the eviction order of the landlord due to non-occupation of the shop room for more than six months without reasonable cause is sustainable in the facts of the case.
Whether the tenant is liable to surrender vacant possession within one month.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
YOOSUF
- respondent
NANI
- respondent
SAUMINI
- respondent
MANMADAN
- respondent
VASANTHA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court