Ramesh v. Sulaiman
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner in Original Petition (RC) No. 86 of 2018, a rent control matter, sought and was granted permission to withdraw the petition on the ground that an appeal was filed. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to withdraw the original petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANNIE JOHN
MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST 2018 / 15TH SRAVANA, 1940
OP (RC).No. 86 of 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN RCP 28/2015 of MUNSIFF COURT, KODUNGALLUR
PETITIONER(S)/3RD PARTY:-
RAMESH, S/O.KRISHNAN KUTTY, AGED 51 YEARS, ERUMATHURUTHY HOUSE, PERINJANAM VILLAGE / POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 686.
BY ADV.SRI.P.K.RAVISANKAR
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONERS 1 TO 4:-:
- SULAIMAN,
S/O.AHMED HAJI, AGED 67 YEARS, CHERIYAVATTATHU HOUSE, REPRESENTED BY HIS AGENT ANVWAR, S/O.AHMED HAJI, AGED 60 YEARS, CHERIYAVATTATHU HOUSE, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE / POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 681.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramesh
- respondent
Sulaiman
- respondent
Abdul Rahman
- respondent
Anvwar
- respondent
Ashraf
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court