Mani v. Girish
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a writ under Article 227 seeking directions to expedite disposal of a claim petition. Court noted report stating the petition had been disposed of and allowed the petition by recording that disposal.
What did the court decide?
This petition is disposed of by recording the disposal of the underlying claim petition as reported by the District Judge.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2018 / 13TH POUSHA, 1939
OP (MAC).No. 122 of 2017
OP(MV) 704/2006 OF 1ST ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, THRISSUR.
PETITIONER:
MANI, S/O.NAGAPPAN, AGED 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT PUTHOKADAN HOUSE, MAROTTICHAL P.O., THRISSUR, NOW RESIDING AT 'DIVYASRAMAM', P.O.CHENNAIPARA, THRISSUR.
- BY ADVS.SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON
- SRI.A.R.NIMOD
RESPONDENT(S):
1. GIRISH, S/O.SANKARANKUTTY,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal to dispose of a claim petition where it has already been discharged by the District Judge?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mani, S/O.Nagappan
- respondent
Girish, S/O.Sankarankutty
- respondent
Jineesh, S/O.Chandran
- respondent
National Insurance Company Limited
- respondent
The New India Insurance Company Limited
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court