Dismissed

Santhosh Kumar D v. Sreedevi A.P

Kerala HC7 Nov 2018OP (FC)/596/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court permitted the petitioners to withdraw the original family court petition (OP No. 596 of 2018) and consequently dismissed it as withdrawn. The matter was disposed of on the same day of admission without substantive adjudication on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the original petition was granted; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Santhosh Kumar D Vs Sreedevi A.P — Matrimonial and Divorce | Kerala HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM &

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR

¶5

WEDNESDAY,THE 07TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018/16TH KARTHIKA, 1940

¶6

OP (FC).No. 596 of 2018

¶7

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 237/2016 of FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM DATED 27-07-2018

¶8

PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:

¶9

1 SANTHOSH KUMAR D, AGED 47, S/O DHAMODARAN, KANIYAT HOUSE, VALLAMKULAM WEST PO, THIRUVALLA, REP BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, HIS BROTHER SHAJI, S/O DHAMODARAN, AGED 52,KANIYAT HOUSE, VALLAMKULAM WEST PO, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DT.

¶10

2 K.SIVARAJAN,AGED 67, S/O DHAMODARAN, KANIYAT HOUSE, VALLAMKULAM WEST PO, THIRUVALLA, REP BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, HIS BROTHER SHAJI, S/O DHAMODARAN, AGED 52,KANIYAT HOUSE, VALLAMKULAM WEST PO, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

¶11

3 K.SHAJI,AGED 52 YEARS, S/O DHAMODARAN,KANIYAT HOUSE, VALLAMKULAM WEST P.O.THIRUVALLA,PATHANAMTHITTA DT. .

¶12

BY ADVS. SMT.M.R.REENA SRIP.S.SUJETH

¶13

RESPONDENT/S:

¶14

SREEDEVI A.P AGED 37 YEARS W/O SANTHOSHKUMAR, ARIKATHILA HOUSE, CHOTTANIKKARA PO, ERNAKULAM 682 312

¶15

THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

C.K. ABDUL REHIM &

¶17

T.V. ANILKUMAR, JJ.

¶18

-----------------------------------------------------

¶19

O.P.(FC) No. 596 OF 2018 R

¶20

-------------------------------------------------------

¶21

Dated this the 7^th day of November, 2018

¶22

J U D G M E N T

¶23

Abdul Rehim, J.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this court to withdraw the above original petition. Permission is granted. The above original petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶25

Sd/- C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE .

¶26

Sd/- T.V. ANILKUMAR, JUDGE .

ul/-

[True copy]

P.S. to Judge.

APPENDIX

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:

¶32

EXHIBIT P1 IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 27.7.2018 IN IA NO 3369/2017 IN OP NO 237/2016 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY DEEDS EXECUTED BY THE 1ST AND 2ND PETITIONERS INFAVOUR OF THE 3RD PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE OP NO 237/2016 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT ERNAKULAM. EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE ATTACHMENT PETITION IN OP NO 237/2016 AS IA NO 297/2016 EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING SHEET OF THE OP OBTAINED FROM THE FAMILY COURT ERNAKULAM. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION TO LIFT THE ATTACHMENT AS IA NO 3369/2017 EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE VALUATION REPORT OF THE 1ST PETITIONERS PROPERTY. EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE VALUATION REPORT OF THE 2ND AND 3RD PETITIONERS PROPERTY. EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE VALUATION REPORT OF THE 2ND AND 3RD PETITIONERS PROPERTY. EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE TRAVEL DETAILS OF THE 2ND PETITIONER EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE PASSPORT ANDS TRAVEL DETAILS OF THE 3RD PETITIONER.

Santhosh Kumar D v. Sreedevi A.P

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santhosh Kumar D v. Sreedevi A.P

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muraleedharan Nair @ Santhosh Vs Abitha K.S.

Nithya Anand Vs Anish Vijayan

Jayakumar Vs Bindhu

Jayan.R Vs the State of Kerala

Mary George Vs State of Kerala

Radha, Vs District Police Chief