Salam v. Dr. Shyla
Case brief
What is this about?
In an original petition under Article 226, the High Court of Kerala directed the Family Court, Mavelikkara, to dispose of a petitioners' review application before the Advocate Commissioner records evidence in connected family court cases.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the Family Court, Mavelikkara, to dispose of Ext.P3 review application before evidence is recorded by the Advocate Commissioner.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. NARAYANA PISHARADI
WEDNESDAY,THE 03RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 11TH ASWINA, 1940
OP (FC).No. 539 of 2018
IN OP 34/2015 of FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA
PETITIONERS/2ND & 3RD RESPONDENTS:
1 SALAM AGED 51 YEARS S/O ABDULLA, RESIDING AT MUNNAKKAPARAMBIL, CHENTHRAPINNI PO, PERUMPADAPPU DESOM, KODUNGALLOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT
2 HILAL, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. ABDULLA RESIDING AT MUNNAKKAPARAMBIL CHENTHRAPPINNI P./O., PERUMPADAPPUDESOM, KODUNGALLOOR, THIRSSUR DISTRICT
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court is directed to dispose of a review application before recording evidence by an Advocate Commissioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1 SALAM
- petitioner
2 HILAL
- respondent
DR. SHYLA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court