under a marital tie; and shortly thereafter they have decided to separate. It is specifically mentioned that, the parties lost unanimity to continue under the conjugal tie on the day of the marriage itself and the marriage was not consummated. They lived together hardly for one month, within which time they realized that the marital bondage has been broken irretrievably. They decided to live separated, after informing the parents and relatives of both the parties. All attempts made by their parents and relatives to resume marital harmony turned futile. Mediation attempts made by office bearers of the branch committee of S.N.D.P also failed and they were also convinced about the irretrievable breakdown of the marital relationship. Thereafter all the issues with respect to exchange of properties were settled and a decision was taken to dissolve the marriage by mutual consent through process of law. It is specifically mentioned that, the marriage was on 09-12-2016 and they started living separated on 17-01-2017. It is also stated that, the 2nd petitioner before the Family Court, who is the respondent herein, is working abroad and is available on a short leave to prefer the joint petition based on the settlement arrived and that he has to return back within a short span. It was specifically mentioned that if the parties have to wait for expiry of the one year period as required under the proviso to Section 14 (1) of the Act, it
