Suveesh v. Bijinabal
Case brief
What is this about?
The court rejected the petitioner's offer to return 60 sovereigns of gold as a bona fide attempt to satisfy a decree, viewing it as a strategy to delay the sale of properties ordered elsewhere. The original petition was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's offer to return gold ornaments rejected; Original Petition dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH
TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1939
OP (FC).No. 138 of 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER IN EA NO. 6/2018 IN EP NO. 21/2017 IN OA NO. 963/2011 OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOZHIKODE DATED 09.02.2018.
PETITIONERS
- 1 SUVEESH, S/O.SUDAKARAN, AGED 38 YEARS, MELEPARAMBIL VEETIL, CHERINCHAL, (P.O.) KARANTHUR, KUNNAMANGALAM AMSOM,
- KARANTHUR DESOM, KOZHIKODE-673571.
- 2 VIMALA, W/O SUDAKARAN, AGED 66 YEARS, MELEPARAMBIL VEETIL, CHERINCHAL, (P.O.) KARANTHUR, KUNNAMANGALAM AMSOM,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's offer to return gold ornaments is bona fide or an attempt to delay execution proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suveesh
- petitioner
Vimala
- respondent
Bijinabal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court