Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

L.Rajasree Vs Jayamohan — Kerala HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

Home
Kerala HC
2018
L.Rajasree Vs JayamohanL.Rajasree v. Jayamohan

Dismissed

L.Rajasree v. Jayamohan

Kerala HC20 Dec 2018OP(C)/972/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted permission to the petitioners to withdraw their Original Civil Petition No. 972 of 2018 and dismissed the same as withdrawn.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN

THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018/29TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940

O.P.(C)No.972 of 2018

(AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28-10-2017 IN I.A.No.2361/2017 IN O.S.No.315/2017 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, KOLLAM)

PETITIONERS:

1 L.RAJASREE, AGED 45 YEARS, D/O. LEELA BAI, RESIDENT OF LEELA VIHAR, ULIYACOIL CHERRY, KOLLAM VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT REVATHI, PRA NO. 105, NEAR RADIO STATION, ENGINEERING COLLEGE.P.O., PANGAPPARA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

2 R. KEERTHANA, AGED 20 YEARS, D/O. RAJASREE, RESIDENT OF LEELA VIHAR, ULIYACOIL CHERRY, KOLLAM VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT REVATHI, PRA NO. 105, NEAR RADIO STATION, ENGINEERING COLLEGE.P.O., PANGAPPARA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.NIKHIL

RESPONDENTS:

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
L. Rajasree
petitioner
R. Keerthana
respondent
Jayamohan
respondent
Leela Bhai
respondent
Vishnu.A.
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 20 Dec 2018 · December
Registered: 2 Apr 2018
Case no.: OP(C)/972/2018

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Sathish Ninan

David Laly Vs James Joseph
19 Dec 2018
Dr.Jayasree Gopinath Vs Gopinath
19 Dec 2018
Ancy Joseph Vs Siby Thomas
19 Dec 2018
Balan Vs Ibrayi
20 Dec 2018
Subhaida Vs G.Pazhanimala

Cite this judgement

L.Rajasree v. Jayamohan, OP(C)/972/2018 (KL), decided on 20 December 2018.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Sathish Ninan

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The High Court of Kerala allowed the petitioners' application to withdraw the original civil petition with leave of the court. The petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn without adjudication of the merits or resolution of any substantive legal issue.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

1 JAYAMOHAN, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O. G.S.NARAYANAN NAIR, RESIDING AT LEELA VIHAR, ULIYACOIL CHERRY, KOLLAM EAST VILLAGE, KADAPPAKKADA.P.O., KOLLAM-691 008.

2 LEELA BHAI, AGED 74 YEARS, W/O. G.S.NARAYANAN NAIR, RESIDING AT LEELA VIHAR, ULIYACOIL CHERRY, KOLLAM EAST VILLAGE, KADAPPAKKADA.P.O., KOLLAM-691 008.

2

O.P.(C)No.972 of 2018

3 VISHNU.A., AGED 21 YEARS, S/O. ARAVINDAKSHAN, RESIDING AT 'V' NIVAS, PERINAD VILLAGE, CHANDANATHOPE.P.O., KOLLAM-691 014.

4 VISHAKH.A., AGED 20 YEARS, S/O. ARAVINDAKSHAN, RESIDING AT 'V' NIVAS, PERINAD VILLAGE, CHANDANATHOPE.P.O., KOLLAM-691 014.

5 P.G. ARAVINDAKSHAN, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, S/O. GOPALA PILLAI, RESIDING AT 'V'NIVAS, PUNUKKANNOOR CHERRY, ALUMMOODU.P.O., KOLLAM-691 577.

BY ADVS. SRI.B.MOHANLAL SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.ARUN BABU SRI.P.PRIJITH SRI.THOMAS P.KURUVILLA

THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20.12.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

O.P.(C)No.972 of 2018

3

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw

the O.P.

Permission granted. O.P is dismissed as

withdrawn.

Sd/-

SATHISH NINAN

JUDGE

ss

O.P.(C)No.972 of 2018

4

APPENDIX

PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1. A TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S. NO. 315 OF 2017 ON THE FILES OF THE HON'BLE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, KOLLAM.

EXT.P2. A TRUE COPY OF I.A. NO. 2361 OF 2017 IN O.S. NO. 315 OF 2017 ON THE FILES OF THE HON'BLE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, KOLLAM.

EXT.P3. A TRUE COPY OF OBJECTION TO I.A. NO. 2361 OF 2017 IN O.S. NO. 315 OF 2017 ON THE FILES OF THE HON'BLE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, KOLLAM.

EXT.P4. A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 01-01-2018 BUT PRONOUNCED ON 28-10-2017 IN I.A. NO. 2361 OF 2017 IN O.S. NO. 315 OF 2017 ON THE FILES OF THE HON'BLE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, KOLLAM.

Vishakh.A.

Coram

AI extract

Sathish Ninan

CNR

KLHC010238302018

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED

20 Dec 2018

Santhosh Kumar P.K. Vs Thomas K. Joy

20 Dec 2018