Cite this judgement

Vs, OP/7955/1989 (KL), decided on 26 September 2018.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

Parties & counsel

Research

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

Vs — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2018)

Home
Kerala HC
2018
VsVs

Dismissed

Vs

Kerala HC26 Sept 2018OP/7955/1989

Download

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶4

WEDNESDAY,THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 / 4TH ASWINA, 1940

¶5

OP.No. 7955 of 1989

PETITIONER/S:

xxx

BY ADV. .

RESPONDENT/S:

xxx

BY ADV. SRI.A.SUDHI VASUDEVAN SC KSEB

¶12

SUDHEER GANESH KUMAR SC KSEB

¶13

THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26.09.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
xxx
respondent
xxx
respondent
SUDHEER GANESH KUMAR SC KSEB

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 26 Sept 2018 · September
Registered: 1 Jan 1970
Case no.: OP/7955/1989

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

Cite this judgement

Vs, OP/7955/1989 (KL), decided on 26 September 2018.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

Parties & counsel

Dismissed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

¶14

JUDGMENT

¶15

The files are not available. Neither the petitioner nor the

¶16

respondents are present. In such circumstances, the original petition is to be closed for all practical purposes. If any of

¶17

the parties is having any surviving grievances, they are free to reopen the original petition. The original petition is therefore, dismissed as infructuous. Sd/-

¶18

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶19

JUDGE

¶20

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

CNR

KLHC010018661989

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

A.muhamed Mustaque

Disposal

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The Kerala State Electricity Board Vs C.K. Abdul Majeed

26 Sept 2018

M/S.Sri Sai Maharaj Pulp& Paer Mills Ltd. Vs District Collector,Palakkad

26 Sept 2018

Vs

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Thomas George Cmi Vs the University Grants Commission

M.V. Krishnankutty Vs the State of Kerala

M.E.S. Aa Rahim Memorial Central School Vs Union of India

Johnson K.V Vs Smt. Vrinda Devi N.R

Vs

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Thomas George Cmi Vs the University Grants Commission

M.V. Krishnankutty Vs the State of Kerala

M.E.S. Aa Rahim Memorial Central School Vs Union of India

Johnson K.V Vs Smt. Vrinda Devi N.R

A compact analysis

The Kerala State Electricity Board Vs C.K. Abdul Majeed

M/S.Sri Sai Maharaj Pulp& Paer Mills Ltd. Vs District Collector,Palakkad