Murali v. Vishnu
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam, under Article 227, issued passing orders directing the Sub Court, Thrissur to dispose of a pending execution application within one month while keeping further execution proceedings in abeyance to preserve the subject matter.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Sub Court to dispose of E.A. No.210/2018 within one month; deferred further proceedings in the execution petition to preserve the subject matter.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 8TH PHALGUNA, 1939
OP(C).No. 565 of 2018
OS 1086/2010 OF THE SUB COURT,THRISSUR
PETITIONER(S)/JUDGMENT DEBTORS/DEFENDANTS
- 1 MURALI, S/O.VELAYUDHAN,AGED 61,RESIDING AT KILIYANTHARA VEETTIL, KAZHIMBRAM DESOM,EDAMUTTAM.P.O,PIN-680568, VALAPPAD VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK,THRISSUR DISTRICT.
- 2 VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O.MURALI,AGED 56,RESIDING AT KILIYANTHARA VEETTIL, KAZHIMBRAM DESOM,EDAMUTTAM.P.O,PIN-680568, VALAPPAD VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK,THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.DR.V.N.SANKARJEE
SRI.V.N.MADHUSUDANAN SMT.R.UDAYA JYOTHI SRI.M.M.VINOD SMT.M.SUSEELA
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Sub Court, Thrissur should be directed to dispose of an application expeditiously.
Whether further proceedings in an execution petition should be kept in abeyance to preserve the subject matter of the lis.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Murali
- petitioner
Vijayalakshmi
- respondent
Vishnu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court