Janaki v. Narayanan
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Original Civil Petition, the Kerala High Court directed the lower court to re-frame an issue in a partition suit. The court held that the issue should be whether the plaint schedule properties are partible or not.
What did the court decide?
The issue was to be recast as: 'Whether the plaint schedule properties are partible or not.'
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
MONDAY ,THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940
OP(C).No. 3306 of 2018
PETITIONER/S:
JANAKI, AGED 43 YEARS W/O.PADINHAREPURAKKAL JANAKAN, D/O.THAZHATHE ERANHIKKATT VELAYUDHAN(INADVERTENTLY WRITTEN AS DAUGHTER OF THAZHATHEPURAKKAL VELALYUDHAN IN THE PLAINT), PACHATTIRI AMSOM, PARAVANNA DESOM, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ SMT.T.S.SREEKUTTY
RESPONDENT/S:
1 NARAYANAN
S/O.ERANHIKKAL SHANKARAN, VALAVANNUR AMSOM DESOM, VALAVANNUR(PO), PIN-676 551, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should re-frame the issue regarding the partibility of plaint schedule properties in a partition suit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JANAKI
- respondent
NARAYANAN
- respondent
DEVAYANI
- respondent
AMMUKUTTY @ VALLI
- respondent
VELAYUDHAN
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court