Rincy v. Sobhana M.V
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed the defendants' petition challenging an order allowing the plaintiffs to re-examine a witness for the limited purpose of addressing new documents produced by defendants.
What did the court decide?
No costs. The order permitting re-examination stands.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
WEDNESDAY,THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 25TH ASWINA, 1940
OP(C).No. 2169 of 2017
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 111/2007 of SUB COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA
PETITIONER/S:/DEFENDANTS
1 RINCY AGED 39, D/O.SEBASTIAN, VALIKULATH HOUSE, MOOLAMATTOM PO, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685589.
2 LINDA MINOR AGED 15, D/O.LATE AVERRELL, VALIKULATH HOUSE, MOOLAMATTOM PO, REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER/ NEXT FRIEND, RINCY, AGED 39, D/O.SEBASTIAN, VALIKULATH HOUSE, MOOLAMATTOM PO, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685589.
BY ADVS. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW SRI.GIBI.C.GEORGE
RESPONDENT/S:/PLAINTIFFS :
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the first plaintiff can be recalled for further examination regarding documents produced by defendants after the withdrawal of a review application.
Whether the original order permitting re-examination survives the withdrawal of the subsequent review application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RINCY
- petitioner
LINDA
- respondent
SOBHANA M.V
- respondent
GEORGE
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court