Rusha Anil v. Manoj Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed an Original Petition (Civil) filed under Article 226 as withdrawn by the petitioner, vacating the previous interim stay order on salary attachment.
What did the court decide?
The original petition was dismissed as withdrawn; interim stay on salary attachment was vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 13TH MAGHA, 1939
OP(C).No. 14 of 2018
(EP.NO.254/2014 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM)
PETITIONER/JUDGMENT DEBTOR:
RUSHA ANIL,W/O.ANIL,AGED 44 YEARS, SELECTION GRADE TYPIST,COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICE (SALE TAX OFFICE), MAVELIKKARA (RESIDING AT KALATHIL HOUSE,PALLANA.P.O.,ALAPUZHA).
BY ADVS.SRI.M.R.SUDHEENDRAN SMT.L.LAKSHMI OMANAKUTTAN
RESPONDENT(S)/DECREE HOLDER:
1. MANOJ KUMAR.S/O.MOHANAN, MANJUSHA BHAVAN,RANDAMCHIRA, POUDIKONAM.P.O.,TRIVANDRUM-695 587.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RUSHA ANIL
- respondent
MANOJ KUMAR
Coram
ALEXANDER THOMAS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court