Asokan N.M v. Babu P.A
Case brief
What is this about?
In an original petition challenging an order in a suit for prohibitory injunction regarding a bus sale dispute, the High Court held that the petitioner was not aggrieved by the direction to deposit the balance claim in court and dismissed the petition.
What did the court decide?
The matter before this court (original petition) was dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 23RD JYAISHTA, 1940
IA. NO.301(A)/2018 IN OS. NO.55/2018 OF MUNSIFF COURT, WADAKKANCHERY.
PETITIONER/DEFENDANT
ASOKAN N.M., S/O. NADUVILPURAKKAL MADHAVAN, PARLIKAD, MUNDATHIKODE, THRISSUR-680 601.
BY ADVS.SRI.SAM ISAAC POTHIYIL, SMT.N.S.HASNA MOL, SMT.ANILA UMESH, SRI.K.AMAR RAGH, SRI.N.MANEESH.
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF.:
BABU P.A., S/O. PULIKOTTIL ANTONY, PONNORE, EDAKKALATHUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK, PIN-680 552.
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-06-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is aggrieved by the order directing deposit of the balance amount in court in a suit for prohibitory injunction.
Whether the original petition should be allowed or dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ASOKAN N.M.
- respondent
BABU P.A.
Coram
SATHISH NINAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court