The High Court of Kerala heard a matrimonial appeal coupled with a non-prosecution request. The appellant furnished no instruction to retained counsel, resulting in the dismissal of both connected matrimonial appeals for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 / 26TH BHADRA, 1940
Mat.Appeal.No. 453 of 2009 (D)
AGAINST THE ORDER IN OP 11/2007 of FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM,
DATED 19-01-2009
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
GOPALAKRISHNAN, S/O THIRUNILATH NARAYANAN, THEYYALA POST, NANNAMBRA,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.P.SUDHEER SMT.P.JAYALAKSHMI
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 REENA, D/o KAITHAKATTIL KUTTAN, KAITHAKATTIL HOUSE, OMACHAPUZHA POST, MANALIPUZHA, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2 SURESH, SO.THIRUNILATH KUMARAN, THIRUNILATH HOUSE, NANNAMBRA, THEYYALA POST,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17.09.2018, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.697/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mat. Appeal Nos.453 & 697/2009
2
JUDGMENT
A.M.Shaffique, J.
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no instruction in these matters. Hence, both these Mat. appeals are dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
A.M.SHAFFIQUE
JUDGE
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
//True copy //
DMR/-
P.A. to Judge
Gopalakrishnan
Reena
Suresh
A.M. Shaffique
P. Somarajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
