Thankachan v. Jessy Thankachan
Case brief
What is this about?
Matrimonial appeal dismissed by default because appellant's counsel was absent when the case was called, despite a prior delay request.
What did the court decide?
Appellants' matrimonial appeal dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BABU
THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 24TH JYAISHTA, 1940
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 846/2006 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA DATED 23-02-2008
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT;
THANKACHAN, AGED 40, S/O.EBRAHAM, CHAZHIPURATHU VEEDU, AYIRANALLOOR MURI,, EROOR VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK.
BY ADV.SRI.AJAYA KUMAR. G
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER::
JESSY THANKACHAN, AGED 19 YEARS, D/O.LISSY, CHARUVILA VEEDU, ANTHAMAN MURI,, KALAYAPURAM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK.
R, BY ADV. SRI.B.CHANDRA LAL R, BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN
Parties & counsel
- appellant
THANKACHAN
- respondent
JESSY THANKACHAN
Coram
K.HARILAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court