This matrimonial appeal was disposed of as infructuous. The High Court accepted counsel's submission that the dispute had been settled out of court, leading to the dismissal of the appeal on that ground without prejudice to the underlying suit.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous due to an out-of-court settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BABU
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 16TH MAGHA, 1939
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 164/2005 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA DATED 02-03-2006
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS
1 MANOJ, S/O.VELAPPAN, AGED 36, KUNNAMKARA VEEDU, KUZHIMATTOM, CHINGAVANAM,, KOTTAYAM.
2 VELAPPAN, AGED 61 OF DO.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) SRI.P.SREEKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S)/PLAINTIFFS:
1. SHEEBA, D/O THANKAMONY, AGED 23 KIZHAKKE ATTATHU PADINJATTATHIL,, ELIODE, EDAKKADOM P.O., EZHUKONE VILLAGE,, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK. 2. ATHIRA (MINOR) REP BY HER MOTHER, SHEEBA OF DO.
R,R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-02-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.HARILAL & A.M.BABU, JJ.
---------------------------
MAT.APPEAL No. 105 of 2007
---------------------------
Dated this the 5th day of February, 2018
JUDGMENT
K.Harilal, J.
The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the matter in dispute involved in this appeal has been settled out of Court and has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, this Mat.Appeal will stand dismissed as infructuous.
K.Harilal Judge
A.M.Babu Judge
sks/5.2.2018
MANOJ & ORS.
SHEEBA & ORS.
K.HARILAL
A.M.BABU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
