onwards. Ext.A9 is the copy of visa and Ext.A10 is the salary certificate issued from Kuwait Reconstruction House, which shows that the deceased was getting 159 Kuwait Dinar. Even though, Ext.A9, A10, A11 and A13 were produced before the lower court, the above salary was not properly proved and the above documents were not counter signed by the Indian Embassy, Kuwait. In the absence of such counter signature, it is difficult to take that amount for calculating compensation, it is better to take just monthly income as per the Indian standard. There are five dependents, out of which two are minors. The learned Tribunal took Rs.6,000/- as his monthly income, but the appellants claimed Rs.40,000/- per month. The deceased was 42 years at the time of accident. Hence, as a crane operator, just income has to be taken. In view of Dixit Kumar and Ors. v. OM Prakash Goel (2017 ACJ 2057), this court take Rs.12,000/- as his monthly income. In addition to that, in view of Pranay Sethi (supra), 25% is to be added towards future prospects. Hence the monthly income of Rs.15,000/- (Rs.12,000+3,000) is taken for calculating the dependency compensation. The total amount is Rs.15,000x12x14=Rs.25,20,000/-, out of which, 1/4th is to be
