Radhakrishnan v. Rajan Nair
Case brief
What is this about?
The Motor Accident Claims Appeal was dismissed for default because the appellant and his counsel were absent. No representation was made before the court.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN
TUESDAY ,THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 22ND KARTHIKA, 1940
M.A.C.A.No. 2790 of 2008
AGAINST THE AWARD IN OPMV 1767/1995 of MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, KOLLAM DATED 08-01-2003.
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O. THANKAPPAN, CHAKKICHAZHIKATHU VEEDU, KANNIMEL CHERY, RAMAN KULANGARA, KOLLAM.3
BY ADVS. SRI.B.MOHANLAL SRI.SAIJU S.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 RAJAN NAIR, S/O GOPALAN NAIR, KALIYILIL VEEDU, RAMAN KULANGARA, KOLLAM.3
Parties & counsel
- appellant
RADHAKRISHNAN
- respondent
RAJAN NAIR
Coram
P.D.RAJAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court