Dineshan v. the United India Insurance Company
Case brief
What is this about?
The Motor Accident Claims Appeal was dismissed as abated because the appellant, who had died, had no legal representatives impleaded in time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN
MONDAY ,THE 05TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 14TH KARTHIKA, 1940
MACA.No. 110 of 2008
AGAINST THE AWARD IN OPMV 1295/2003 of M.A.C.T.,KOTTAYAM DATED 0407-2007
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
DINESHAN CHIRAYIL, KARTHIK BHAVAN,, PATTAMMUTTOM P.O.,, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADVS. SRI.G.SUKUMARA MENON SMT.DEEPTHI S.MENON
RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT:
THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SRI.LAKSHMANAN T.J.
THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MACA.No. 110 of 2008
2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that appellant died. The legal representatives of the appellant are not impleaded in time.
In the circumstance, this appeal is dismissed as
abated.
Sd/- P.D.RAJAN
JUDGE
bng/07.11.18
DINESHAN CHIRAYIL
THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY KOTTAYAM
P.D.RAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court