sought to be executed. The duty of the court is to execute the decree as such. It has to be executed in reference to the spirit of the decree. But the court, at any event, shall not exceed the four corners of the decree. Going by the decree sought to be executed (a copy of which was supplied by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner in C.R.P No. 620 of 2015), it is clear that nothing was mentioned in the decree regarding either existence of such a chal or right of parties, if any, over the chal. The decree was passed only with respect to the well situated and the right of parties to take water by either installing electric motor or by other means and also to preserve the retaining wall of the well by cutting and removing trees attached to the wall around it. In short, the decree sought to be executed does not disclose any right or interest of the parties over any existing channel and does not contain anything to show the recognition of existence of such a chal. The fact that the chal is situated at a distance from the well and passing through the
