Rahul a. v. Shameer a.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking quashing of proceedings. The Court found the matter amicably settled and no serious injuries, quashing further proceedings under IPC Sections 447, 427, and 308.
What did the court decide?
All further proceedings against the petitioners in C.P.No.71 of 2017 at Thalassery, arising from Crime No.599/2017 at Chakkarakkal, are quashed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 2ND PHALGUNA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 844 of 2018
CP. NO.71/2017 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THALASSERY. CRIME NO. 599/2017 OF CHAKKARAKKAL POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT.
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 1 TO 3
1 RAHUL A., S/O PAVITHRAN, AGED 25 YEARS, VARSHA NIVAS, P.O. MUNDAYAD, KANNUR. 2 NIDHIN. C., S/O MANI, AGED 26 YEARS, AISWARYA BHAVAN, ATHIRAKAM, P.O. MUNDAYAD, KANNUR. 3 PRIYESH. P., S/O ANKAJAN, AGED 34 YEARS, ARAMBAN HOUSE, PALLIPRAM.
BY ADV.SRI.K.RAJESH SUKUMARAN
RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO- COMPLAINANT:
1. SHAMEER A., S/O HYDER, AGED 40 YEARS, SAMEERAS HOUSE, PALLIPROM, MUNDAYAD P.O., KANNUR-670 597. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether further criminal proceedings should be discontinued after amicable settlement between parties.
Whether Section 308 IPC attracted in the absence of serious injuries.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAHUL A.
- petitioner
NIDHIN. C.
- petitioner
PRIYESH. P.
- respondent
SHAMEER A.
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court