Allowed

C.K. Anandan Pillai v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC14 Dec 2018Crl.MC/616/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 500 IPC initiated against the appellant in view of the settlement between the parties. The court held that no public interest was involved in continuing the trial, and therefore, there was no impediment to granting the prayer for quashing.

What did the court decide?

Quashed the proceedings in C.C.No. 874 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-I, Kozhikkode.

C.K. Anandan Pillai Vs State of Kerala — Quashing and FIR | Kerala HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

¶4

FRIDAY ,THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA, 1940

¶5

Crl.MC.No. 616 of 2014

¶6

IN CC 874/2013 of JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, KOZHIKODE

¶7

PETITIONER/IST ACCUSED :-

¶8

C.K. ANANDAN PILLAI AGED 66 YEARS S/O.G.RAGHAVAN PILLAI, MADHAVAM, MANGALAM GARDENS,THRISSUR - 5.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.RAVI KRISHNAN

¶10

RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT :-

¶11

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM THROUGH SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,CHEVAYOOR POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE.

¶12

2 K.P.RAMANUNNI S/O.LATE DAMODHARAN NAIR, KARUMATHIL PUTHENVEEDU,PERUMANNA P.O., KOZHIKODE 673 576

¶13

BY ADVS. SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.) SRI.SAJU.S.A

¶14

R1 BY SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK SR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶15

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.12.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

Crl.MC.No. 616 of 2014

¶17

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

Petition filed under section 482 Cr.P.C.

¶20

2. Petitioner is the accused in C.C.No. 874 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-I, Kozhikkode registered for the offence under section 500 IPC. The 2nd respondent is the victim. It

¶21

is submitted that the matter has been settled and the proceedings in the trial court may be quashed.

¶22

3. Heard the learned counsel for the

¶23

petitioner and second respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶24

4. I have perused the affidavit filed by the

¶25

second respondent, who has entered appearance through counsel. I am satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this case. There

¶26

is no impediment for granting the prayer of the petitioner.

¶27

In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. The proceedings in C.C.No. 874 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-I, Kozhikkode are quashed. Sd/-

¶28

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW,

¶29

SMA JUDGE

¶30

Crl.MC.No. 616 of 2014

¶31

¶32

APPENDIX

¶33

PETITIONER'S/S ANNEXURES :-

¶34

ANNEXURE A-1 ANNEXURE-A1: THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE COMPLAINT IN CC NO.874/2013 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT - I, KOZHIKODE FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

¶35

ANNEXURE A-2 ANNEXURE-A2: THE TRUE COPY OF THE ARTICLE PUBLISHED IN SAHITYA VIMARSAM BI-MONTHLY.

¶36

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :- NIL

¶37

//True Copy//

¶38

PA TO JUDGE

¶39

SMA

C.K. Anandan Pillai v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.K. Anandan Pillai v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.M.K.Shereef Vs Moideen Hareef

Shafiq Vs State of Kerala

Usha Vs State of Kerala

Firozkhan @ Shinu Vs the State of Kerala

Ashique P.P Vs Hameed T.Abdulla

Muhammed Ashiq Vs State of Kerala