Babu.C.K v. Chanthu
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala allowed the criminal miscellaneous petition and quashed all further proceedings in FIR 288/2017. The court noted the dispute arising from offences under IPC 323, 324 and SC/ST Act 3(2)(v)(a) was amicably settled by the complainant.
What did the court decide?
Crl.M.C. allowed and all further proceedings pursuant to Annexure 1 FIR in Crime No.288/2017 quashed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 18TH MAGHA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 577 of 2018
CRIME NO. 288/2017 OF PERUVANNAMUZHY POLICE STATION , KOZHIKODE
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
BABU.C.K, S/O APPUKUTTY NAIR, AGED 54 YEARS, PALOTTUTHARAMMAL HOUSE, MUTHUKAD, CHAKKITTAPARA PO,KOZHIKODE
BY ADVS.SRI.M.PROMODH KUMAR SMT.MAYA CHANDRAN
RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT & STATE:
1. CHANTHU,S/O MATHAN, AGED 56 YEARS, THUVVAKADAVIL, KOLATHOOR COLONY ROAD, MUTHUKAD, CHAKKITTAPARA PO, KOYILANDY THALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT- 673 526
2. STATE OF KERALA,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether high court can quash proceedings when matter is settled between parties
Whether high court has satisfaction to quash proceedings subsequently settled
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BABU.C.K
- respondent
CHANTU
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court