Disposed

Nasarudheen @ Muthu v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC25 Jan 2018Crl.MC/323/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court refused to consider the petitioner's contentions at this premature stage. The court directed the petitioner to raise all arguments before the trial court during the trial or under Section 227 Cr.P.C., and then disposed of the criminal miscellaneous case.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was given liberty to take up contentions before the trial court at Section 227 Cr.P.C. or during trial.

Nasarudheen @ Muthu Vs State of Kerala — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Kerala HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2018 / 5TH MAGHA, 1939

¶5

Crl.MC.No. 323 of 2018

¶6

------------------SC. NO.651/2015 of SUB COURT, TIRUR. CRIME NO. 488/2008 OF KALPAKANCHERY POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM.

¶7

PETITIONER(S) -------------

¶8

NASARUDHEEN @ MUTHU, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL KAREEM, MACHICHERI HOUSE, VALAVANNUR AMSOM, CHERUVANNOOR DESOM, MALAPPURAM.

¶9

BY ADV.SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN

¶10

RESPONDENT(S):

¶11

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALPAKANCHERY POLICE STATION, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶12

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.ALEX M.THOMBRA.

¶13

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-01-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

rs.

¶15

Crl.MC.No. 323 of 2018 ()

¶16

APPENDIX

¶17

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

¶18

ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR DATED 21.08.2008. ANNEXURE A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 03.11.2008.

¶19

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL.

¶20

//TRUE COPY//

¶21

P.S. TO JUDGE rs.

¶22

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

¶23

................................................................ CRL.M.C. No. 323 of 2018

¶24

............................................................... Dated this the 25^th day of January, 2018

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

The arguments presently advanced by the learned

¶27

counsel for the petitioner are not matters which can be considered by this Court at this stage. The present stage is too premature to consider the said aspects. At the same time, the petitioner can take up all these contentions before the trial court, either at the stage of Section 227 Cr.P.C. or during trial.

¶28

With liberty to the petitioner to take up all these contentions before the trial court, either at the stage of Section 227 Cr.P.C. or during trial, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of.

¶29

Sd/- B. KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE.

¶30

ul/-

¶31

[True copy]

¶32

P.S. to Judge.

Nasarudheen @ Muthu v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nasarudheen @ Muthu v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prajith Vs State of Kerala

Ali Vs State of Kerala

Fazil Vs State of Kerala

Shylabhai Vs State of Kerala

Musthafa Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Sajilesh Vs State of Kerala