Muneeb v. Sharafudheen
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Kerala quashed criminal proceedings in special court under SC/ST (POA) Act and IPC regarding alleged trespass and injuries after the parties resolved their dispute and victims expressed no objection to quashing.
What did the court decide?
All further proceedings in S.C.No.355 of 2015 arising from Crime No.981 of 2013 will stand quashed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1940
Crl.MC.No. 1195 of 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 355/2015 of SPL.COURT-TRIAL OF OFFENCE UNDER SC/ST(POA)ACT1989, MANNA CRIME NO. 981/2013 OF MANNARKKAD POLICE STATION , PALAKKAD
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:
- 1 MUNEEB AGED 21 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMED, KATTUKANDAN VEEDU, KOTTOPADAM, BHEEMANAD P.O., MANNARKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
- 2 AFSAL, AGED 23 YEARS,
- S/O.KUNHAIMU, PULIYAKODAN VEEDU,
- KOTTOPADAM, BHEEMANAD P.O.,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings under sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 294(b), 506(ii), 308 IPC arising from an insult to an SC/ST should be quashed on grounds of resolved dispute and lack of serio
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MUNEEB
- petitioner
AFSAL
- petitioner
SHIHABUDEEN
- petitioner
JAFAR
- petitioner
SHERIF MUTHALIF
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court