victim to use all these three items of gold ornaments besides gold bangles (which were not recovered by the prosecution). Even according to PW7, these gold ornaments were used by the victim as part of her ornaments of daily use and never removed the same from her body. MO1 gold chain was recovered based on the disclosure statement alleged to have been given by the accused while under custody on 19.1.2012. Ext.P5 receipt of pledge of gold chain issued by PW15 was seized at the time of arrest of the accused from his body. PW15 had admitted that he had received MO1 chain from the accused which was pledged with him for an amount of Rs.30,000/- on 19.1.2012. The recovery of MO1 chain, based on the confession statement of the accused while under custody cannot be brought under Section 27 of the Evidence Act because, of the reason that the investigation had knowledge about the place wherein the above said object was entrusted and it is evident from Ext.P5 receipt recovered from the body of the accused. The receipt itself discloses the name and address of the financial institution, gold loan number, date of gold loan, name of accused, the amount received under the loan and the weight of the gold ornament as 14 gms. It was recovered from the body of the accused at the time of arrest. So discovery of the said gold
