Dismissed
V.v.Haridas v. Sri. Tomin Thachenkary IPS
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/915/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2018 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 915 of 2018 IN WPC. 12904/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12904/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 06-06-2017
PETITIONER(S):/PETITIONER IN WPC
V.V.HARIDAS, GENERAL SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, REG.NO. 3/2015, PANCHAVADI BUILDING, MAITHRA MARKET P.O, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA 688 539 (AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. VISWANATHAN, AMBATTU VAYALIL HOUSE, VALLACHIRA P.O, PALA)
BY ADV.SRI.K.P.JUSTINE (KARIPAT)
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.1 IN WP(C):
SRI. TOMIN THACHENKARY IPS, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023.
BY.T.P SAJAN, SC, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION - KSRTC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-07-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 915 of 2018 IN WPC. 12904/2017
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 6.6.2017 IN WPC NO.12904/2017
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
dlk/19/7/18
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
CO(C)No.915 of 2018
in
WP(C) No.12904 of 2017
Dated this the 19th day of July, 2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed complaining that the directives
contained in the judgment dated 06.06.2017 are not complied with.
Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the
petitioner submitted that already the directives are complied with.
Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt case any further.
Contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
dlk/19/7/18
V.V. Haridas
Sri. Tomin Thachenkary
SHAJI P. CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court