Dismissed
Annapoorna Vanitha Canteen v. Dr.v.S.Sajeev
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/61/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 20TH MAGHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 61 of 2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)NO. 25257/2017, DATED 23-08-2017
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WP(C)NO.25257/2017 :
ANNAPOORNA VANITHA CANTEEN, (A UNIT OF NEDUMANGAD MUNICIPALITY, KUDUMBASREE CDS-II), NMC 13/1666-1, NEDUMANGAD TALUK DISTRICT HOSPITAL COMPOUND, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR S.SYAMALAKUMARI, AGED 50 YEARS, D/O. SARASAMMA.
BY ADV.SRI.ANIL KUMAR M.SIVARAMAN
RESPONDENT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT IN WP(C)NO.25257/2017:
DR.V.S.SAJEEV, S/O.SAMBASIVAN, AGED 49 YEARS, THE SUPERINTENDENT, NEDUMANGAD TALUK DISTRICT HOSPITAL, NEDUMANGAD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 541.
BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-02-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
Con.Case(C).No. 61 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE A1: TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT PREPARED BY THE HOSPITAL AUTHORITY. ANNEXURE A2: CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)NO. 25257/2017.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.S.TO JUDGE
Msd.
Devan Ramachandran, J.
======================
Cont.Case (C) No.61 of 2018 in W.P.(C) No.25257 of 2017
========================== Dated this the 09th day of February, 2018
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the directions in the judgment in question has been complied with by the respondent. She therefore, says that the petitioner
does not intend to prosecute this case any further.
This contempt case is thus closed, recording the
submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sd/-
Devan Ramachandran,
Judge
SB/09/02/2018
// true copy //
P.A to Judge
ANNAPOORNA VANITHA CANTEEN
DR.V.S.SAJEEV
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court