Thomas v. Imbasekhar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt proceeding regarding alleged disobedience of an interim order to inspect quarries, the Court closed the case, deeming the issue of quarry licensing better suited for disposal in the underlying writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; liberty granted to seek orders in writ petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ANTONY DOMINIC &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 584 of 2018 IN WPC. 6029/2018
- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 6029/2018 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED
- 22-02-2018
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS 1,3,4 AND 5:
- 1 THOMAS,
- S/O. IYPE, AGED 50 YEARS, EDASSERY HOUSE, MALAYATTOOR P.O, MALAYATTOOR VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
- 2 AKHIL KUMAR, S/O. BALAN N.K ALIAS BABU, AGED 30 YEARS, NEDUVELI, MALAYATTOOR P.O, MALAYATTOOR VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
- 3 ELDOSE ELIAS,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition alleging non-compliance with directions should be dealt with separately or in the main writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Thomas
- respondent
Imbasekhar
Coram
Antony Dominic
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court