Court closed Contempt Case No. 566 of 2018 upon the respondent producing an order, allowing the petitioner to move appropriate proceedings if aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 566 of 2018
---------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 21532/2017 DATED 30-06-2017 -------------
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C)NO.21532/2017:
C.N. VENUGOPALAN,
S/O.K.R.NARAYANAN,AGED 67 YEARS,NADANAM,KESARI JUNCTION, NORTH PARAVUR,ERNAKULAM,KERALA,PIN-683513.
BY ADV.SRI.RENNY AUGUSTINE
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C)NO.21532/2017:
RAJIV KUMAR, S/O AND AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY(BANKING)MINISTRY OF FINANCE,GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIAMENT STREET,NEW DELHI-110001.
BY ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-04-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.V.
Con.Case(C).No. 566 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN PWC NO 21532/2017 DATED 30.6.2017. ANNEXURE B: TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 14.9.2017. ANNEXURE C: TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 9.1.2018.
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE R1(a) TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 12.2.2018. ANNEXURE R1(b) TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY UNION BANK OF INDIA.
/TRUE COPY/
K.V. P.S.TO JUDGE 5.04.2018
P.V.ASHA J.
Contempt Case (C) No.566 of 2018
------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of April, 2018
JUDGMENT
The respondent has produced Ext.R1(a) passed
on 12.02.2018 after hearing the petitioner pursuant to
the judgment Annexure A.
In the above circumstances, the contempt
case is closed with liberty to the petitioner to move
appropriate proceedings in case he is aggrieved.
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.
ww
C.N. VENUGOPALAN
RAJIV KUMAR
P.V. ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
