Badarul Muneer v. K.K.Roy Kurian
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner submitted that the directions of the prior judgment were complied with. The court accepted the submission and closed the contempt case.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 54 of 2018
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.31264/2017 DATED 11-10-2017)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
BADARUL MUNEER, S/O.HAMEED KUNJU, AGED 29 YEARS, IKKARA (H), EDAPALLYKOTTA P.O., PANMANA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV.SRI.JITHIN VARGHESE
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO. 4:
K.K.ROY KURIAN,
FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, THE MANGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA MINERALS AND METALS LTD., SANKARAMANGALAM, CHAVARA-691 583, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Badarul Muneer
- respondent
K.K. Roy Kurian
Coram
P.V. Asha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court