V.Sreelatha v. Smt.K.Valsala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed contempt alleging non-compliance with a prior judgment. Court noted respondent's submission that the judgment was fully complied with. Case dismissed as closed, preserving liberty to seek rehearing if the submission is not credible.
What did the court decide?
Case closed; liberty to petitioner to seek rehearing if submission of full compliance is not credible.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 538 of 2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 20200/2011 OF THE HON'BLE COURT DATED 30-05-2017
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:-
V.SREELATHA, WIFE OF MANOJ KUMAR, AGED 39 YEARS, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT,DEVI VILASOM HIGH SCHOOL KANDANKARY P.O, THAYANKARY, EDATHUA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT
BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED
SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR
RESPONDENT/4TH RESPONDENT:
SMT.K.VALSALA, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KUTTANAD P.O RAMANKARY, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 689 595
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the judgment in W.P.(C) No.20200 of 2011 has been complied with by the respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sreelatha, Wife of Manoj Kumar
- respondent
K. Valsala
Coram
Devan Ramachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court