C I Pankajakshan v. Vijayan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed against the Additional District Magistrate of Palakkad, the court recorded that both parties submitted that directions in a connected writ judgment had been complied with, and thus closed the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 410 of 2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 21945/2012 DATED 15-09-2015
PETITIONER/PETITIONER
C I PANKAJAKSHAN, S/O. ITTAMAN, CHITTIATH HOUSE, MANGALAM DAM POST,ALATHUR, PALAKKAD
BY ADVS.SRI.SAJI KURIACHAN
SRI.M.R.NANDAKUMAR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
VIJAYAN., (AGE & FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CIVIL STATION,PALAKKAD 678 001
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C I PANKAJAKSHAN
- respondent
VIJAYAN. AND THEN ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD
Coram
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court