M.G.Ganapathy Embrandhiri v. v.a.Sheeja
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 15TH PHALGUNA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 393 of 2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27973/2017OF THE HON'BLE COURT DATED 15-01-2018
PETITIONER:
M.G.GANAPATHY EMBRANDHIRI S/O. M.G GANAPATHY EMBRANDHIRI, AGED 58 YEARS, MANGALATH EDAMANA (H), CHOONDAL P.O, THRISSUR PIN 680 502.
BY ADVS.SRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH SMT.AKHILASREE BHASKARAN
RESPONDENT(S):
V.A.SHEEJA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, THE SECRETARY, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, THRISSUR - 1.
BY SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN, SC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-03-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PBS
Con.Case(C).No. 393 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15/01/2018 IN W.P.(C)NO. 27973/2017 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE NIL
/TRUE COPY/
PA TO JUDGE
PBS
6/3/2018
P.V.ASHA J.
-------------------------- -----------Contempt Case (Civil).No.393 of 2018
--------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of March, 2018
JUDGMENT
The learned Standing Counsel submits that
subsistence allowance due to the petitioner, along with arrears, have already been paid.
Therefore, this Contempt Case is closed.
P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.
ww
M.G.GANAPATHY
V.A.SHEEJA
P.V.ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court