Petitioner alleged non-compliance with a March 8, 2017 judgment. Courts held directives were complied with and closed the contempt proceedings.
The contempt case was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 385 of 2018
THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)NO.5366/2017 DATED 08-03-2017.
PETITIONER(S)
M/S. NAVIN CONSTRUCTIONS CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, N. SUGATHAN, ILLIKKATTU HOUSE, AIMS PONEKKARA P.O, EDAPPALLY, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.JOMY GEORGE
SRI.DEEPAK MOHAN SMT.A.MINI JOSEPH.
RESPONDENT(S):
1. SHINAMOL, AGED 42 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.
2. PREETHIMOL,
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, P.H. CIRCLE, KOZHIKODE- 673 001.
3. PRAKASHAN,
4. USHA RADHAKRISHNAN,
5. MUHAMMED RAFI, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, PROJECT DIVISION, MALAPPURAM- 676 001.
BY SRI.P.BENJAMIN PAUL, SC.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-04-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
05/03/2018.
Con.Case(C).No. 385 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 08/03/2017 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN W.P.(C)NO.5366/2017.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
rs. 05/03/2018.
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
COC No.385 of 2018
----------------------------------------------Dated this the 4th day of April, 2018
J U D G M E N T
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner
complaining that the directives contained in the judgement dated 8.3.2017 is not complied with.
with. Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt of court proceedings any further.
Contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
smv 4.4.2018
M/s. Navin Constructions Corporation
Shinamol
Preethimol
Prakashan
Usha Radhakrishnan
Muhammed Rafi
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
