Disposed
K.Girish Kumar v. Shyna Mol.a.
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/365/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1940 Con.Case(C).No. 365 of 2018
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.31347/2017 DATED 03-10-2017)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
K.GIRISH KUMAR, AGED 53 YEARS, SON OF LATE E.M. RAMAN NAIR, HEAD OPERATOR- SUPERVISORY, W.S SECTION, KUTHUPARAMBA W.S. SUB DIVISION, THALASSERY, PH DIVISION, KANNUR DISTRICT- 670 643
BY ADV.SRI.JACOB ABRAHAM
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
SHYNA MOL.A., AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALBHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM, TRIVANDRUM- 695 033
BY SRI.P.BENJAMIN PAUL, SC,
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-04-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts 13/4/2018
Con.Case(C).No. 365 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 3/10/2017 MADE IN WP(C) NO.31347 OF 2017 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. ANNEXURE 2 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE PETITIONER'S LETTER DATED 19/10/2017 ADDRESSED TO THE RESPONDENT
ANNEXURE 3 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 13/11/2017 ISSUED TO THE RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
sts 13/4/2018
P.V.ASHA J.
-----------------------------------Contempt Case (Civil) No.365 of 2018
------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of April, 2018
JUDGMENT
The learned Standing Counsel made available
a copy of the order passed pursuant to Annexure-1 judgment.
Accordingly, this contempt case is closed with liberty to petitioner to move appropriate
proceedings in case he is aggrieved by the order.
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.
ww
K.GIRISH KUMAR
SHYNA MOL.A.
P.V.ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court