Disposed
Abdul Latheef M v. Beena
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/279/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
What did the court decide?
contempt case closed
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 279 of 2018 IN WPC. 32348/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 32348/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 31-10-2017
PETITIONER/IST PETITIONER:
ABDUL LATHEEF M AGED 49 YEARS, S/O MUHAMMED HANEEFA MUSLIYAR, DARUL AMAAN, KAYPADI, CHEKKAKONAM P.O., KARAKULAM, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 564.
BY ADV.SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT:
BEENA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SECRETARY, NEDUMANGADU MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, NEDUMANGADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN, SC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-03-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 279 of 2018 IN WPC. 32348/2017
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE-A1 - TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE RESPONDENT DATED 14.09.2017. ANNEXURE-A2 - TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE RESPONDENT DATED 30.09.2015. ANNEXURE-A3- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)No.12270/2016 DATED 23.09.2016. ANNEXURE-A4 - COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)No.32348/2017 DATED 31.10.2017. ANNEXURE-A5 - TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE RESPONDENT DATED 17.01.2018 BEARING NO.TPI/6575/2015.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
rk
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
===================
Cont. Case (C).No. 279 of 2018
Dated this the 26th day of March, 2018
JUDGMENT
The counsel for the respondent submits that
the direction issued by this Court has been complied with. There is no appearance for the petitioner.
In the light of the submission made by the
learned counsel for the respondent, the contempt case is closed.
Sd/-
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
JUDGE
SKS
Abdul Latheef M
Beena
P.B. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court