Disposed

Sreekanth A.S. v. Rakesh Sharma

Kerala HC21 Feb 2018Con.Case(C)/2280/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt proceeding, the petitioner offered to remit a specific sum. The court directed respondents to issue a relieving order effective from June 18, 2017, conditional on such payment, explicitly stating this direction should not be treated as a precedent. The case was then closed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to issue relieving order with effect from 18.06.2017 contingent on petitioner remitting Rs. 34,726/-.

Sreekanth A.S. Vs Rakesh Sharma — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 2ND PHALGUNA, 1939

¶5

Con.Case(C).No. 2280 of 2017

¶6

AGAINST THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.P.(C)NO. 18644/2017, DATED 16.06.2017

¶7

PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER/IN WP (C) NO. 18644 OF 2017:

¶8

SREEKANTH A.S., FORMERLY MANAGER, CANARA BANK ERAVIPEROOR, PATHANAMTHITTA, ( RESIDING AT SREELEKSHMI, KRISHNAPURAM, NEYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - PIN - 695 121.

¶9

BY SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON, SENIOR ADVOCATE

¶10

ADV. SMT.M.C.SINY

¶11

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 IN W.P.(C)NO.18644 OF 2017 :

¶12

1. RAKESH SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O.( FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) MANAGING DIRECTOR, CANARA BANK, HEAD OFFICE, NO. 112, JC ROAD, BANGLORE - 560 002.

¶13

2. G.K.MAYA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS D/O. ( FATHERS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) GENERAL MANAGER, CANARA BANK CIRCLE OFFICE, CANARA BANK BLDG, SPENCER JUNCTION, M.G. ROAD, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001.

¶14

BY ADVS. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SRI.P.GOPINATH SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN SRI.KURYAN THOMAS SRI.PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM SMT.NAYANPALLY RAMOLA

¶15

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-02-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

Msd.

¶17

Con.Case(C).No. 2280 of 2017

¶18

APPENDIX

¶19

PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :

¶20

ANNEXURE	I: THE TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 16.06.2017 IN W.P.(C)NO. 18644 OF 2017 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
ANNEXURE	II: THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18.07.2017 IN R.P.NO.555 OF 2017 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM.
ANNEXURE	III: THE TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 25.08.2017 SENT BY THE PETITIONER DATED 08.09.2017.
ANNEXURE	IV: THE TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL SENT BY THE PETITIONER DATED 08.09.2017.
RESPONDEN	T(S)' ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE	R2(A): A TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILED STATEMENT OF RECOVERY EFFECTED/TO BE EFFECTED FROM THE ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER DATED 02.01.2018.
ANNEXURE	R2(B): A TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 19.08.2017.
ANNEXURE	R2(C): A TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 28.08.2017.
	//TRUE COPY//

P.S.TO JUDGE

Msd.

P.V.ASHA J.

-------------------------------------Contempt Case (Civil).No.2280 of 2017 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 21^st day of February, 2018

¶25

J U D G M E N T

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶27

the petitioner will remit the amount of Rs.34,726/-

¶28

by way of demand draft as directed in the E Mail.

¶29

In the peculiar circumstances of the case, there

¶30

shall be a direction to the respondents to issue the relieving order to the petitioner with effect from 18.06.2017, without treating the same as a precedent.

¶31

Accordingly, the contempt case (Civil) is closed.

¶32

Sd/- P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.

¶33

Sreekanth A.S. v. Rakesh Sharma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sreekanth A.S. v. Rakesh Sharma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Binu Thomas Vs State of Kerala

Valliyammal Vs the Director of Social Justice Department

Deepa M.M Vs High Court of Kerala

T.O.Bhaskar Vs Smt.P.K.Jayasree

Vasu v Vs Sri.P.M.Gopalakrishnan

Ramesh Vs Assistant Devaswom Commissioner