Disposed

Ramesh.R v. Dr.Usha Titus

Kerala HC4 Jan 2018Con.Case(C)/2044/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This was a contempt case where the Court proceeded with the admission. The Government Pleader submitted a copy of the order accepted in a related writ petition. The Court concluded the contempt proceedings by noting the order, granting liberty to move afresh if aggrieved, and closing the matter.

What did the court decide?

Contempt proceedings closed; liberty to move afresh against the order in the related writ petition if aggrieved.

Ramesh.R Vs Dr.Usha Titus — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY 2018 / 14TH POUSHA, 1939

¶5

Con.Case(C).No. 2044 of 2017

¶6

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 18685/2017 DATED 19-06-2017

¶7

PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶8

RAMESH.R., AGED 39 YEARS, S/O REGHUNATHAN K., LIGHT VEHICLE DRIVER, SCHOOL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O-673 635

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.T.B.HOOD SMT.M.ISHA SRI.AMAL KASHA

¶10

RESPONDENT(S)/3RD RESPONDENT:

¶11

DR.USHA TITUS., AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001

¶12

BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN

¶13

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-01-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

sdr/-

¶15

Con.Case(C).No. 2044 of 2017 -------------------------

¶16

APPENDIX

¶17

PETITIONERS ANNEXURES

¶18

ANNEXURE	1 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 22.06.2016 SENT BY THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT TO THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
ANNEXURE	2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.06.2017 IN WRIT PETITION C 18685/2017
ANNEXURE	3 TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATION DATED 03.10.2017 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER
ANNEXURE	4 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO PETITIONER CERTIFYING THAT HE APPEARED FOR HEARING ON 10.10.2017

¶19

RESPONDENTS ANNEXURERS NIL

/TRUE COPY/

PA TO JUDGE

sdr/-

P.V.ASHA J.

C.O.C.(C) No.2044 of 2017

¶25

-------------------------------------

¶26

Dated this the 04^th day of January, 2018

¶27

JUDGMENT

¶28

The learned Government Pleader made

¶29

available a copy of the order passed pursuant to Annexure 2 Judgment.

¶30

Thus, contempt case is closed with

¶31

liberty to petitioner to move afresh, in case he is aggrieved by the order.

¶32

Sd/-

¶33

P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.

¶34

Ramesh.R v. Dr.Usha Titus

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh.R v. Dr.Usha Titus

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anilkumar Vs N.Padmakumar

A.R.Mohankumar Vs Dr.Usha Titus

T. Chandrasekharan Pillai Vs Smt.Shainamol

Kiran Kumar. S Vs the Kerala Water Authority

Abdul Nazar K. Vs Kseb

Evansu P.S Vs Life Insurance Coporation of India