This is a final hearing in two contempt cases wherein the learned Standing Counsel submitted that a prior High Court judgment was complied with, leading the court to close the matters without specific disposition details provided in the order text.
Closed on the submission that the primary judgment was complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 16TH CHAITHRA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 1904 of 2017
JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 23189/2017 DATED 24-07-2017.
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS IN WRIT PETITION:
1 K. HAMSA, SANOOJA MANZIL, NORTH ARYAD.P.O, MANNANCHERRY, ALAPPUZHA, (RETIRED CONTINGENT WORKER, ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY)
2 N. RAGHAVAN, RAHUL BHAVANAM, PALLANA.P.O, THRIKKUNNAPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA, (RETIRED CONTINGENT WORKER, ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY).
BY ADV.SRI.C.A.RAJEEV
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN WRIT PETITION:
U.S. SATHEESAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, SECRETARY, ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL BUILDING, ALAPPUZHA-688001.
BY SRI.AZAD BABU, SC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-04-2018 ALONG WITH COC.1906/2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
Con.Case(C).No. 1904 of 2017
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE I : JUDGMENT DATED 24.7.2017 IN WPC.23189/2017 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.S.TO JUDGE
mbr/ 09.04.2018.
P.V.ASHA J.
Contempt Case (Civil) Nos.1904 & 1906 of 2017
------------------------------------------ Dated this the 6th day of April, 2018
JUDGMENT
The learned Standing Counsel submits that
the Annexure-I judgment is complied with.
Accordingly, these Contempt Cases are
closed.
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.
ww
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WPC.23189/2017Referred¶19
K. Hamsa
N. Raghavan
U.S. Satheesan
P.V.Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
