Disposed
Biju S v. Tomin J.Thachankery IAS
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1447/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY,THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 30TH ASWINA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 1447 of 2018 IN WP(C). 19570/2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.19570/2018 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 13-06-2018
PETITIONER/1ST PETITIONER:
BIJU. S., AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.SREEDHARAN, NIKARTHIL, KOKKOTHAMANGALAM P.O.,(DRIVER, K.S.R.T.C., DEPOT, CHERTHALA)
BY ADV. SRI.B.PRAMOD
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
TOMIN J.THACHANKERY IAS, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.R.T.C., TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
BY SRI.T.P.SAJAN, SC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.10.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 1447 of 2018 2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the
directions in the judgment has been complied with. Recording the above submission of the learned counsel for the respondent, the contempt of court case is closed.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN
JUDGE
Con.Case(C).No. 1447 of 2018 3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.06.2018 IN WP(C) NO.19570/2018 ANNEXURE II TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 21.06.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ANNEXURE III TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 28.06.2018 SENT BY THE RESPONDENT
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
NIL
//True Copy//
P.A. To Judge
BIJU. S.
TOMIN J.THACHANKERY
ANU SIVARAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court