Disposed
Sunny P.J. v. Sureshkumar T.K.
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1235/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018 / 20TH ASHADHA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 1235 of 2018 IN WPC. 32503/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 32503/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WPC.
SUNNY P.J. AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH, RESIDING AT PANACKAL HOUSE, ANDOOR, VADUVANCHAL PO.
BY ADV.SMT.TESSY JOSE
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
SURESHKUMAR T.K. AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, P.H.DIVISION, SULTHAN BATHERI, WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN-673 592.
BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-07-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 1235 of 2018 (S) IN WP(C).32503/2017
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE A. COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC 32503/2017 DATED 22.2.2018 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
smv
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
COC No.1235 of 2018
Dated this the 11th day of July, 2018
J U D G M E N T
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner
complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 22.2.2018 is not complied with.
for petitioner submitted that, the retention amount is received . Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the
contempt of court proceedings any further.
Contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
smv 11.7.2018
SUNNY P.J.
SURESHKUMAR T.K.
SHAJI P. CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court