Contestants filed this contempt case alleging non-compliance of directives in WP(C) 32071/542017.Dated 09-11-12.The court was satisfied that directives complied with produced order 22.1.2018.Case closed.
Contempt case closed as directives found complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 23RD MAGHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 107 of 2018 IN WPC. 32071/2017
-------------------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 32071/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 09-11-2017
------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
AGED 22 YEARS, S/O VIJAYAN K.P, 3RD YEAR STUDENT,
AND TECHNOLOGY, KARUKUTTY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
RESIDING AT SREYAS PUTHANCHERI PARAMBU,
TECHNOLOGY, KARUKUTTY, ERNAKULAM DIST.
RESIDING AT PULIKKANATU HOUSE, MATHILAKAM PO, TRISSUR-680785.
BY ADVS.SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ
KUM.A.ARUNA KUM.THULASI K. RAJ
RESPONDENT(S):
1. DR.G.P.PADMAKUMAR
FATHER'S NAME AND AGE ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS,
2. PROF.(DR) J LETHA,
FATHER'S NAME AND AGE ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, VICE CHANCELLOR,APJ ABDUL KALAM TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY,
Con.Case(C).No. 107 of 2018 IN WPC. 32071/2017
3. DR. S SHABU,
4. SHRI. M.R UNNI,
5. DR. BABDU SETASTIAN,
6. DR. THOMAS JOHN MAMPRA,
7. PROF. M. MADHAVAN,
R1 TO R3 BY SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, SC, KTU
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-02-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 107 of 2018 IN WPC. 32071/2017
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE I: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 9.11.2017 IN WP(C)NO.32071/2017
ANNEXURE II: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT NANDITHA T K Vs. APJ ABDUL KALAM TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY & OTHERS 2017(3) KLT 1098
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
dlk
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
C.O.(C) No.107 of 2018
Dated this the 12th day of February, 2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed complaining that the directives
contained in the judgment dated 9.11.2017 is not complied
with.
appearing for respondents has produced an order dated
22.1.2018, from where I am satisfied that, the directives are
complied with.
If petitioners are aggrieved, necessary action may be taken
against them.
Leaving open the liberty, contempt case is closed.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
dlk/12/2/
Sreehari.R
Vivek Vijayan
Shahasad Mohammed
Dr. G.P. Padmakumar
Prof. (Dr) L Letha
Dr. S Shabu
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
