In this contempt of court case, the petitioner alleged non-compliance with prior directives. Upon hearing, the court accepted counsel's submission that compliance had been effected and closed the case.
Contempt case closed as directives were found to be complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
THURSDAY ,THE 01ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 10TH KARTHIKA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 1030 of 2018 IN WP(C). 37202/2017
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC 37202/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
N.V.PAULOSE AGED 60 YEARS,S/O.VARKEY, NEDUMGOTTIL HOUSE,VALAMBOOR,NORTH MAZHUVANNUR,P.O.,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-686669.
BY ADVS. SRI.JOBY JACOB PULICKEKUDY SRI.ANIL GEORGE
RESPONDENT/S:
AJAYAKUMAR I.A.S AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALABHAVAN,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695001.
BY SRI.P.BENJAMIN PAUL, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the
directives contained in the judgment dated 2.3.2018 are not complied
with.
Con.Case(C).No. 1030 of 2018 IN WP(C). 37202/2017 2
Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner
submitted that the directives are already complied with. Therefore, I do not
find any reason to pursue the contempt case any further.
Contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P.CHALY JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 02.03.2018 IN WPC NO.37202 OF 2017
dlk/1/11/18
N.V.PAULOSE
AJAYAKUMAR
SHAJI P.CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
