This judgment dismissed a second application for anticipatory bail under S. 438 Cr.P.C. The High Court held that in the absence of any change in the factual circumstances of the case, entertaining such an application amounts to an abuse of court process.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. NARAYANA PISHARADI
MONDAY ,THE 05TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 14TH KARTHIKA, 1940
Bail Appl..No. 6623 of 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMC 714/2018 of D.C. & SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM DATED 21-05-2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN Bail Appl. 3696/2018 of HIGHCOURT
CRIME NO. 688/2018 OF East Kallada Police Station , Kollam
PETITIONER/S:
RONY AGED 36 YEARS S/O.KOICHOR, THEKKECHARUVILA VEEDU, CHITTAYAM, PANAYAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SIJU KAMALASANAN
RESPONDENT/S:
STATE OF KERALA THROUGH THE S.I. OF POLICE, EAST KALLADA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.
SMT.MAYA.M.N.-PP
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Bail Appl..No. 6623 of 2018
2
O R D E R
This is the second application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Bail Appl..No. 6623 of 2018
3
In the result, the application is dismissed.
Sd/-R. NARAYANA PISHARADI
JUDGE
lsn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a second application for anticipatory bail can be entertained without any change in circumstances.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pandi v. State of KeralaRelied on¶27
Pandi v. State of Kerala : 2018 (4) KLT 249
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rony
State of Kerala
R. Narayana Pisharadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
