Petitioner accused sought withdrawal of their bail application. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the application accordingly.
Allowed withdrawal of the bail application; application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JULY 2018 / 15TH ASHADHA, 1940
Bail Appl..No. 4105 of 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN Bail Appl. 7229/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED14-11-2017 CRIME NO. 37/2017 OF MANJESWAR POLICE STATION , KASARGOD
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED 1 AND 2:
BY ADV.SMT.K.PUSHPAVATHI
RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.
2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANJESHWAR, KASARAGOD, PIN-671323
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-07-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
SUNIL THOMAS, J.
=================
B.A.No.4105 of 2018
=================
Dated this the 6th day of July, 2018
ORDER
When the matter was taken up, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that he will be permitted to withdraw the bail application.
Accordingly, bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
SUNIL THOMAS Judge
Sbna/6/7/18
True Copy / P A to Judge
Marimuthu @ Sreedhar @ Mohammed Ashraf
Abdul Salam
State of Kerala
Sunil Thomas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
